8-24-2025 4:37am

Beacon Hill Roll Call

Alan Earls Editor

If you have any questions about this week's report, e-mail us at bob@beaconhillrollcall.com or call us at (617) 720-1562.

Volume 50 -Report No. 34

August 18-22, 2025

By Bob Katzen

GET A FREE SUBSCRIPTION TO MASSTERLIST – Join more than 30,000 people, from movers and shakers to political junkies and interested citizens, who start their weekday and Saturday mornings with MASSterList—the popular newsletter that chronicles news and informed analysis about what’s going on up on Beacon Hill, in Massachusetts politics, policy, media and influence. The stories are drawn from major news organizations as well as specialized publications.

MASSterList will be e-mailed to you FREE every Monday through Saturday morning and will give you a leg up on what’s happening in the blood sport of Bay State politics. For more information and to get your free subscription, go to: www.massterlist.com

THE HOUSE AND SENATE: There were no roll call votes in the House or Senate last week. This week, Beacon Hill Roll Call reports local senators’ roll call attendance records for the 2025 session through August 22.

The Senate has held 68 roll calls so far in the 2025 session. Beacon Hill Roll Call tabulates the number of roll calls on which each senator voted and then calculates that number as a percentage of the total roll call votes held. That percentage is the number referred to as the roll call attendance record.

Senate rules allow a senator, who is not physically at the session in the Senate chamber, to vote remotely from any location and without giving a reason for his or her absence from the Senate chamber. The House does not permit remote voting.

Sometimes a senator is not able to attend only one or two sessions during which roll calls are held, but since there are sometimes multiple roll calls on each one of those days, the number of roll calls they missed can be high even though they only missed one or two sessions.

Thirty-six (90 percent) out of 40 senators did not miss any roll call votes and had a 100 precent roll call attendance record.

Four (10 percent) out of 40 senators missed one or more roll call votes.

The senator who missed the most number of roll calls is Sen. Lydia Edwards (D-Boston) who missed 23 roll calls (66.1 percent roll call attendance record.) Edwards did not respond to repeated requests from Beacon Hill Roll Call asking her why she missed so many roll call votes.

Two other senators who missed one or more roll call votes are Sens. Mike Barrett (D-Lexington) who missed 2 roll calls (97.0 percent roll call attendance record) and Adam Gomez (D-Springfield) who missed one roll call (98.5 percent roll call attendance record.) Neither one responded to repeated requests from Beacon Hill Roll Call asking them why they missed any roll call votes.

It is a Senate tradition that the Senate president only votes occasionally. Current Senate President Karen Spilka follows that tradition and only voted on 18 (26.5 percent) of the 68 roll calls while not voting on 50 (73.5 percent) of them.

SENATORS' 2025 ROLL CALL ATTENDANCE RECORDS THROUGH AUGUST 22, 2025

Here are the 2025 roll call attendance records of local senators through August 22.

The percentage listed next to the senators’ name is the percentage of roll call votes on which the senator voted. The number in parentheses represents the number of roll calls that he or she missed.

Sen. Rebecca Rausch 100 percent (0) Sen. Karen Spilka President rarely votes

ALSO UP ON BEACON HILL

ALCOHOL LICENSES (H 4285) – The House gave initial approval to a bill that would make changes in some of the state’s alcohol permitting laws.

The measure would authorize on-premises alcoholic beverage consumption within certain noncontiguous area licensed premises subject to approval by the Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission (ABCC). Current law prohibits this licensing unless the areas are contiguous.

The measure also would repeal the current law that prohibits any applicant who has been convicted of a federal or state narcotic drugs charge from holding an on-premises alcoholic beverages consumption license; as well as the current restriction prohibiting any applicant who has been convicted of a felony from holding an off-premises alcoholic beverages consumption license. Those prohibitions would be replaced by a new law requiring that applicants for any license must be of satisfactory character to local and state licensing authorities.

"This bill is an important step toward updating outdated alcohol laws to reflect today's business landscape," said sponsor State Treasurer Deb Goldberg. "By removing unnecessary restrictions and improving oversight, it supports economic growth in our communities while maintaining strong oversight and prioritizing public safety."

Rep. Christopher Worrell (D-Boston), who also sponsored a similar bill, did not respond to repeated requests by Beacon Hill Roll Call asking him to comment on the bill.

Supporters said allowing areas to be non-contiguous mainly impacts outdoor seating and patios. They noted that licensees who have patios that are separated by a sidewalk or a road, under current law, have to go through extra steps to extend their license to that area. They said that the change would simplify that process.

They said that for on-premise and off-premise licenses the rules around criminal record are currently inconsistent. They noted that having any felony conviction disqualifies an applicant from holding an off-premise license, but for on-premise licenses, only narcotics related charges disqualify an applicant.

They argued that the bill would allow local licensing authorities and the ABCC to standardize this process and evaluate an applicant’s criminal record more holistically. They cited cases in which an applicant was charged decades ago and has had zero issues since then. They noted that all applicants would still have a CORI check and be subject to consideration of their character and fitness.

LIQUOR LICENSE SUSPENSION (H 4275) – Current law suspends the liquor license of and closes down for a period of time, any package store that is found guilty of selling to a minor or an intoxicated individual. However, in big box stores, supermarkets, gas stations and other places in which liquor sales are not their primary business, a violation results only in the closing of the liquor department.

A bill, sponsored by Rep. Steven Howitt (R-Seekonk), and given initial approval by the House, would amend current law so that the entire establishment, not just the liquor department, is closed down.

“This bill levels the playing field between small family-owned liquor stores and large corporate big box stores selling liquor,” said Howitt. “It will serve to tighten up the oversight for alcohol sales.”

Howitt continued, ”This bill was filed to strengthen public safety in our cities and towns because illegal alcohol sales have been on the rise due to relaxed regulations during and resulting from the pandemic. The bill also fixes an inadvertent disparity that has developed by reinstating uniform consequences and standards for all establishments licensed to sell alcoholic beverages who willfully violate important public safety regulations regarding alcohol sales to minors or intoxicated individuals. All retailers of alcoholic beverages will be treated equally regardless of whether the establishment is a supermarket, convenience store or package store.

FORTUNE TELLERS (H 475) – The House gave initial approval to legislation that would eliminate the current state law requiring that all fortune telling applicants must have lived in the city or town in which they are seeking their license to practice, for at least one continuous year prior to filing their application.

Supporters said the bill will remove an old law that has become antiquated and makes no sense.

“A municipal employee reached out to me several years back because she had discovered the residency requirement and thought it was a little odd,” said sponsor Rep. Susannah Whipps (U-Athol). “A coffee shop in her city was looking to have a tarot card reader, and as it turns out fortunetellers must be licensed in Massachusetts just as a barber or hairdresser would be and also the law requires residency in the community in which they practice. My bill removes the 1-year residency requirement. This law was most likely put in place to prevent grifters or con artists from coming into a town and scamming people.”

PROHIBIT GROCERY STORES FROM USING BIOMETRICS TO INCREASE PRICES OR SUGGEST ITEMS (H 99) – The House gave initial approval to a measure that would prohibit grocery stores from suggesting items or adjusting the prices of any item directly or indirectly based on the biometric data of individuals collected on the premises of a grocery store. Grocery stores would be allowed to use biometrics to allow customers to voluntarily verify their identity at the point of sale. Violations by a grocery store would result in the store being fined for the amount of actual damages or $5,000, whichever is higher.

According to the website SupermarketNews.com, the biometrics can often involve the scanning of customer fingerprints or retinas.

“I filed this bill after learning that the largest grocery store chain in the U.S. is rolling out facial recognition technology and electronic price tags,” said sponsor Rep. Lindsay Sabadosa (D-Northampton). “These technologies, when put together, allow grocery stores to identify individual customers, their characteristics like race and gender and shopping habits. It has been shown time and time again that pricing algorithms are designed to take more money out of consumer pockets, and there is no place for this at the grocery store.”

In April at a public hearing, Woodrow Hartzog, a professor at Boston University's School of Law, told the Committee on Advanced Information Technology, the Internet and Cybersecurity that surveillance pricing allows companies to figure out the highest price that customers are willing to pay.

"This disastrous practice leads to price gouging, discrimination by proxy, an inability to budget, data hoarding and the suffocating feeling that every choice you make while shopping is a trap," said Hartzog. "This bill would prohibit food stores from using tools like facial recognition to charge people different prices and provide vital breathing room for customers, while still allowing for people to receive discounts."

At the April hearing, Edgar Dworsky, a former assistant attorney general in consumer protection, questioned legislators’ concerns over surveillance pricing.

He suggested that supermarkets would likely use expanded personal data to offer targeted discounts to shoppers -- rather than hitting them with steeper prices. “That would echo how supermarkets have used data gathered from loyalty programs to offer personalized discounts,” Dworsky wrote in written testimony.

"Your bill, however, would prevent stores from using any biometric data collected to offer lower prices to identified shoppers," continued Dworsky, who is also founder of Consumer World. "That strikes me as anti-consumer. If you are not banning the collection of biometric data to start with, why not

simply prevent its use for the purpose of imposing higher than the standard or established price?"

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Massachusetts said that it supports the legislation but wants the protections to be expanded to all goods, not just food. "Prohibit surveillance-pricing generally, not just pricing driven by biometric surveillance," the ACLU suggested in written testimony.

"Charging different customers different prices for the same product based on a personal profile is problematic whether that profile is derived from a person's biometrics or other personal data."

QUOTABLE QUOTES

“Massachusetts is moving faster to create reasonably-priced housing and revitalize our downtowns. This new tax credit helps communities turn empty commercial space into homes – bringing people, energy and small-business customers back to main streets while tackling our housing shortage.”

---Gov. Maura Healey announcing $10 million in tax credits to help convert underused commercial buildings into residential and mixed-use housing across Massachusetts.

“These grants invest in the police officers and firefighters who put their lives on the line to protect our communities. Recognizing the urgent needs faced by many departments, we were quickly able to adapt this year’s program, providing greater flexibility and immediate access to funds. These changes will have an immediate impact on public safety in Massachusetts communities.”

---Office of Grants and Research executive Director Kevin Stanton on awarding $5.7 million to cities and towns to support local fire and police staffing.

“Ensuring that adequate remedial measures are in place to maintain a safe environment for student athletes of color during sporting events is impossible while the Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Association (MIAA) refuses to release records about its practices and protocols for addressing the rising number of discriminatory incidents.”

---Sophia Hall, Lawyers for Civil Rights Deputy Litigation Director, on filing a lawsuit against the MIAA seeking public records regarding incidents of discrimination, harassment and bullying at sporting events sponsored by the MIAA.

“The commission amplifies the voices of women and girls, with commissioners shaping policy by studying key issues, advising on legislation and fostering collaboration across the commonwealth. We seek commissioners who reflect our commonwealth’s diversity and bring passion, expertise and collaboration to improve access to opportunities and equality for all.”

---Rep. Hannah Kane (R-Shrewsbury), announcing the seeking of applicants to serve on the Massachusetts Commission on the Status of Women - a state-established body charged with reviewing the status of women in Massachusetts and offering recommendations regarding policy that would improve access to opportunities and equality. The application deadline is Monday, September 15, 2025, at 5 p.m. More

info at https://masscsw.org/

HOW LONG WAS LAST WEEK’S SESSION?

Beacon Hill Roll Call tracks the length of time that the House and Senate were in session each week. Many legislators say that legislative sessions are only one aspect of the Legislature’s job and that a lot of important work is done outside of the House and Senate chambers. They note that their jobs also involve committee work, research, constituent work and other matters that are important to their districts. Critics say that the Legislature does not meet regularly or long enough to debate and vote in public view on the thousands of pieces of legislation that have been filed. They note that the infrequency and brief length of sessions are misguided and lead to irresponsible late-night sessions and a mad rush to act on dozens of bills in the days immediately preceding the end of an annual session.

During the week of August 18-22, the House met for a total of one hour and 25 minutes and the Senate met for a total of one hour and 27 minutes.

Mon. August 18 House 11:01 a.m. to 12:09 p.m.

Senate 11:16 a.m. to 12:10 p.m.

Tues. August 19 No House session

No Senate session

Wed. August 20 No House session

No Senate session

Thurs. August 21 House 11:01 a.m. to 11:18 a.m.

Senate 11:06 a.m. to 11:39 a.m.

Fri. August 22 No House session

No Senate session.

Bob Katzen welcomes feedback at bob@beaconhillrollcall.com